An incomplete guide to mainstream
After a week of discussion around mainstream, this afternoon I have taken the step of shifting the Mainstream Level to Critical status. I was having trouble getting my head around what exactly this whole mainstream ‘thing’ is. Then it twigged. People cannot conceive of detachment as being part of artistic appreciation: this criticism is practical, active and positive. There is no reason that critical detachment must result in a negative approach. As far as I see it regional theatre has been *rightly so* punching above its weight for years.
This week I took a trip to Bristol to watch Iphigenia in Splott. On the way home I visited Salisbury to watch Hedda Gabler. Both of these fine shows are being performed outside of London. What struck me was the geography of two excellent producing venues (Bristol Old Vic and Salisbry Playhouse) and the exceptional production values on display. It would be moronic to suggest that Iphihenia in Splott might be too challenging for any regional audience because it is ‘alternative’. Regional theatre is often real value for money.
It’s a tricky one – if The Almeida were to go bust, it would be quite sad. But ultimately people would go to another of the many venues in town. If Salisbury Playhouse were to dissapear what provision would there be on that level?
We need a fundamental rethink.
I suppose at a push I like extremely and quite unfashionably traditional productions, yes. We all understand the artistic manouverings that are a fact of life for every subsidised arts organisation in England. Bums on seats etc. But there is a bigger thing going on here. This is a monumental time for British theatre.
Well i’m going to give the mainstream thing a rest… for now. Matt Trueman will do another blog soon, there’s bound to be something funny in that.